Re: "aborting sbp2 command"

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr_at_s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sun 02 Nov 2003 - 14:42:55 CET
Message-Id: <200311021341.hA2Df20E022150@hirsch.in-berlin.de>

On 2 Nov, wwp wrote:
> I've the same problems, see my post to this mailing list [...]
> with an external usb2/ieee1394 aluminium enclosure and a
> 7200RPM IDE drive inside.
> But I have to say that when I use the USB2 connection, it works
> well. And the drives reach the same temperatures, doesn't it?
> Or do you think the ieee1394-specific chipset in my enclosure
> could be more sensible to overheat?
> Moreover, the same enclosure+disk+ieee1394 wire used with a
> win2k system don't lead to any (visible) problem.

I did not claim overheating to be the most likely reason. As for
the Win2k comparison: This could either mean there is a bug in
Linux, or Windows does a better job in handling error conditions.
As for the USB comparison: Means either a software or hardware
problem with IEEE 1394 (... or better handling of error
conditions in scsi + usb-storage compared to scsi + sbp2. I am
not familiar with Linux' SCSI implementation but I somehow doubt
that usb-storage integrates substantially better than sbp2.)

-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=--== =-== ---=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
mailing list Linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux1394-user
Received on Sun Nov 2 14:54:14 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 02 May 2005 - 09:16:45 CEST