--- Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 14 Jan, Richard Molen wrote:
> > 2. sbp-2 dependencies mention ohci, but not uhci. My mainboard
> uses
> > uhci (via chipset), will I need a (ohci or pcilynx) firewire
> card
> > or are there other options?
>
> The sbp2 driver is only dependent on the ieee1394 and the
> scsi_mod drivers, nothing else. However in order to use a SBP-2
> (or any other protocol) over an actual 1394 bus, a driver for the
> bus adapter is also needed. That would be the ohci1394 driver or
> the pcilynx driver.
>
> The ohci1394 driver has nothing to do with the usb-ohci and
> usb-uhci drivers. And there is no UHCI type of IEEE 1394
> adapters.
>
> IEEE 1394 bus adapters made by VIA are OHCI compliant. One of
> my PCs has a VIA KM266 based motherboard with VIA VT6306 OHCI
> adapter and it works very well with Linux 2.4.
Stefan,
It looks like my Via chipset-based motherboards should not be a
hinderance with firewire on a 2.4.x kernel at least.
Thank you for your help,
Richard Molen
> --
> Stefan Richter
> -=====-=-=-- ---= -====
> http://arcgraph.de/sr/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
mailing list Linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux1394-user
Received on Fri Jan 16 00:52:22 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 02 May 2005 - 09:16:45 CEST