On Tuesday 03 February 2004 23:00, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 19:27, James Finnall wrote:
> > Hello List,
>
> Hi!
>
> > The best perfomance
> > I have been able to get using the "hdparm -t" command is about
> > 15 MB/s.
>
> How about hdparm -tT ???
root@Merlin:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.13 seconds =984.62 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.57 seconds = 14.00 MB/sec
> None the less, people have commented for a long time that the
> Linux 1394 implementation isn't up to the performance that
> Windows gets from the same drives. I haven't done any comparative
> testing in a long time (maybe 18 months) but when I did I was
> only getting about 40-50% on Linux what I was getting out of
> Windows in the very same drive.
>
> NOTE: testing the same partition meant testing both with FAT32
> which is admittedly not the best Linux can do, but why should
> Linux be *any* slower doing FAT32? I don't know...
Sorry, but I do not have any (at least convenient way) to test the
system under Windows for any comparison.
The only comparison I have is that I was using this entire subsystem
before I upgraded my system. I did not have any reason to even
question the performance. It always appeared to perform like I
expected.
In that regard of before and now, I may be expecting more from the
system than before as well. This issue has become noticable
because I cannot burn a DVD at 4x speed. So then perhaps another
question for the list in general might be, can anybody burn a 4x
DVD on the firewire bus?
James
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
mailing list Linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux1394-user
Received on Wed Feb 4 14:49:19 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 02 May 2005 - 09:16:46 CEST