Philippe Eberli wrote:
> Well, the Firewire code of Mac OsX is released under the Apple Public
> Source License (APSL) and available under
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.3.8/.
> I don't know if it is legal to copy it.
It is allowed to copy and redistribute code under the terms of the APSL.
http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/
It is not allowed to put derivatives or portions of APSL-licensed code
under the terms of GPL.
> It qualifies as a 'Free
> Software License' (approved by the FSF) but is 'incompatible with the
> GPL' more Information can be found at
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/apsl.html.
> But I hope you have at least the permission to have a look at it
> without breaking one of the two license agreements(GPL & APSL)...
Well, does looking at the code + thereby learning about the implemented
ideas/algorithms + re-implementing the ideas/algorithms + licensing the
result under own terms qualify as legal? This is a somewhat rhetoric
question since it is hard to tell how independent a re-implementation is
once the re-implementor read the source of the original implementation.
-- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=-= --=- -=-=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ mailing list Linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux1394-userReceived on Fri Feb 11 00:05:40 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 02 May 2005 - 09:16:52 CEST