Florian Idelberger wrote:
...
> I plug in the disk (into a pcmcia fw card with a via chipset) it's
> detected and /dev/sda, /dev/sda1 are created. When I try to mount
> though, mount complains with "wrong fs type, bad option, bad
> superblock on /dev/sda1,
> or too many mounted file systems". The problem is just that
> none of this is true, windows (for which sharing data with vfat was
> used) and in the past other linux configurations were able to access
> it flawlessly.
Did you also try an explicit mount call like "mount -t vfat /dev/sda1
/mnt/somewhere"? Is MSDOS partition tables support configured in the
kernel? (I guess the answer to both is yes.)
...
> My Kernel log is flooded with messages like the following:
> Mar 28 17:24:25 [kernel] ieee1394: send packet 400: ffc0a110 ffc1ffff f0010108 00080000
> Mar 28 17:24:25 [kernel] ieee1394: send packet 400: ffc0a900 ffc1ffff f0010110 20d0dd05
> Mar 28 17:24:25 [kernel] ohci1394: fw-host0: IntEvent: 00000010
There is "excessive debugging output" enabled in the IEEE 1394 section
of the kernel configuration, which is just unnecessary.
Otherwise, it looks like for example the posting "Getting portable hard
disk drive to work" on March 24, which is unresolved so far, either.
-- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=-= --== ===-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ mailing list Linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux1394-userReceived on Mon Mar 28 19:01:54 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 02 May 2005 - 09:16:53 CEST