Dan Dennedy <dan@dennedy.org> wrote:
> Thanks, I located the message on the linux1394-devel list:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux1394-devel&m=109862922621832&w=2
>
> There is a very good report response to Olaf's little patch.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux1394-devel&m=109925711513542&w=2
>
> Please, others, try it as well. I'm going to....
This patch helps out a LOT here. Still not perfect, I'll muck around
and try to pin down exactly where it's misbehaving. At the moment, it
appears that /proc/scsi/scsi now ALWAYS has the correct information.
However, /dev/scd? and /dev/sd? are not always bound to sane things.
I'll generate some repeatable tests and post them.
-- Josh Litherland (josh@emperorlinux.com) ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ mailing list Linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux1394-userReceived on Mon Apr 4 17:25:46 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 02 May 2005 - 09:16:53 CEST